The Iveco 159 is a mid-heavy general purpose truck, sold as a rigid or as a tractor for semi-trailers, that the Italian maker Iveco built from 1977 to 1983. It replaced the Fiat Iveco 150 and the Fiat 160, and its unusual number was chosen to mark a clear break from the Fiat 160 before the Iveco 160 range arrived. It was powered by the six cylinder in-line Fiat 8220-02 engine of 9,572 cubic centimetres, giving 201 horsepower DIN, with a 240 horsepower version offered in Italy, where the road code expects eight horsepower for every tonne carried. The permitted gross weight was 16 tonnes, and in France, Germany and Switzerland a tractor version was sold with a train weight of up to 28 tonnes. It was also assembled at the Unic plant at Trappes in France and in the former Magirus-Deutz factories in Germany, and it sold well to small hauliers, mainly in building and public works. The Iveco 160 replaced it in 1983.
Facts
Engine Class EngineFiat 8220-02 six cylinder in-line, 9,572 cubic centimetres 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Iveco 159 (Wikipedia, French edition)
Of Make
Source Iveco 159 (Wikipedia, French edition)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Iveco 159 (Wikipedia, French edition)LeadQuote, Lead
fabriqué par le constructeur italien IVECO de 1977 à 1983
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Iveco 159 (Wikipedia, French edition)Lead, maker nationalityQuote, Lead, maker nationality
fabriqué par le constructeur italien IVECO
Sources
1. Iveco 159 (Wikipedia, French edition)
Lead
fabriqué par le constructeur italien IVECO de 1977 à 1983
Lead, type of vehicle
est un camion polyvalent mi-lourd, porteur ou tracteur de semi-remorques
First series, engine
Le moteur est le fameux et très robuste 6 cylindres en ligne Fiat 8220-02
Lead, replacement
Il sera remplacé en 1983 par l' IVECO 160
Lead, maker nationality
fabriqué par le constructeur italien IVECO
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.