The Italdesign Legram, presented by Italdesign as the Formula Legram, is a research model built for the 1996 Turin Motor Show, a four-seat hatchback coupé on a Fiat Bravo and Brava chassis. It was the elegant member of the Formula project, designed to complement the Formula 4 and the Formula Hammer: where those two were extreme, the Legram was meant for more classic use and looked like a genuine four-seater coupé. Its smooth, sinuous lines recall the cars of the 1960s yet satisfied aerodynamic needs, and Italdesign records a drag coefficient of 0.255 in the wind tunnel. The link to the Bravo and Brava shows in the grille and in the light clusters, which exaggerate the original design and enclose indicators, high beams, low beams and fog lights in a single element. Supercars.net lists a 1,998 cc Fiat five-cylinder engine producing 109.6 kW, mounted transversely at the front and driving the front wheels, in a body 4,270 mm long, 1,790 mm wide and 1,290 mm high on a 2,540 mm wheelbase.
Facts
Engine Class Connections
Of Make
Source Formula Legram (Italdesign)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Formula Legram (Italdesign)Project textQuote, Project text
A research model of a 4-seater hatchback coupé based on a FIAT Bravo & Brava chassis.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Italdesign Giugiaro (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
is an Italian design and engineering company and brand based in Moncalieri
Sources
1. Formula Legram (Italdesign)
Project textQuote, Project text
A research model of a 4-seater hatchback coupé based on a FIAT Bravo & Brava chassis.
View the Source 2. Supercars.net: 1996 Italdesign Legram Concept
Supercars.netTitle
1996 Italdesign Legram Concept
In Detail
Fiat 5 Cyl
In Detail, power
109.6 kw / 147.0 bhp @ 6100 rpm
View the Source Italdesign Giugiaro (Wikipedia)
LeadQuote, Lead
is an Italian design and engineering company and brand based in Moncalieri
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.