Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

GWR 6400 Class

Steam and Early Locomotives

The GWR 6400 Class is a class of 0-6-0 pannier tank steam locomotives introduced by Charles Collett in 1932. All forty were auto-fitted, with the remote-control equipment needed to work autotrains. The design was closely related to the 1930 GWR 5400 Class and to the 1936 GWR 7400 Class, which was similar but had no autotrain apparatus and a higher boiler pressure of 180 psi. Their small 4 ft 7.5 in driving wheels let them work hillier routes than the 5400 Class, and they were first allocated to the South Wales valleys, later working branch lines in Devon and around Plymouth until the early 1960s. Three of the 6400 Class have survived into preservation.

Facts
Year
1932 1
Propulsion
Steam 1
Engine Class
Steam 1
Status
Surviving 1
Comparison
Body Style
Steam Locomotive 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Rail Transport, Modes
Source GWR 6400 Class (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source GWR 6400 Class (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source GWR 6400 Class (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
The Great Western Railway (GWR) 6400 Class is a class of 0-6-0PT type steam locomotives introduced by Charles Collett in 1932.
Sources
1. GWR 6400 Class (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    introduced by Charles Collett in 1932
  • Lead, body style
    is a class of 0-6-0PT type steam locomotives introduced by Charles Collett in 1932
  • Lead, energy source
    is a class of 0-6-0PT type steam locomotives introduced by Charles Collett in 1932
  • Lead, engine class
    is a class of 0-6-0PT type steam locomotives introduced by Charles Collett in 1932
  • Preservation
    Three of the 6400 Class have survived to preservation
  • Lead, manufacturer
    The Great Western Railway (GWR) 6400 Class is a class of 0-6-0PT type steam locomotives introduced by Charles Collett in 1932.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.