Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Fokker V.4

Pioneer and Early Aviation Aircraft

The Fokker V.4 was a prototype German fighter triplane built for the Austro-Hungarian Imperial and Royal Aviation Troops during the First World War. It began as a biplane, but was changed to a triplane after Anthony Fokker learned what a positive impression a British triplane had made on German fighter pilots. Fokker had received an order for a fighter biplane using a 82 kW Oberursel UR.II rotary engine on 13 May 1917, and after returning from a long visit to the front on 13 June, where pilots including Manfred von Richthofen had been greatly impressed by the Sopwith Triplane, he ordered Reinhold Platz to change it to a triplane. By then the company had designed a second version of its cantilever wing with a much lighter hollow double box spar and plywood only on the leading edge, and the fuselage reverted to the slab-sided form of his first fighters, which improved lateral stability and the pilot's downward view. It was shipped to Hungary for evaluation in 1917.

Facts
Status
Prototype 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Fokker V.4 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Fokker V.4 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Fokker V.4 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
The Fokker V.4 was a prototype German fighter triplane built for the Austro-Hungarian Imperial and Royal Aviation Troops

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Fokker V.4 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Fokker V.4 was a prototype German fighter triplane
Sources
1. Fokker V.4 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Fokker V.4 was a prototype German fighter triplane
  • Lead, manufacturer
    The Fokker V.4 was a prototype German fighter triplane built for the Austro-Hungarian Imperial and Royal Aviation Troops
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.