Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Fokker V.2

Pioneer and Early Aviation Aircraft

The Fokker V.2 and V.3 were prototype sesquiplane fighters developed from the Fokker V.1 but using liquid-cooled straight-six engines. Only one example of each was built, in 1917, as they were too heavy to offer any significant advantage over the Albatros D.III fighters already in service. Like the V.1, both had fuselages of circular cross section, which impeded the pilot's view downwards, and cantilever wings built from plywood, the outer part of the staggered upper wing being slightly swept back. The V.2's 120 kW Mercedes D.III piston engine and its radiator were fully cowled and the propeller had a spinner to reduce drag, and it kept the V.1's rotating upper portion of the vertical stabilizer acting as a rudder and fully moving horizontal stabilizers. The V.2 was 10 km/h faster than the V.1 but climbed more slowly. The V.3 differed in having the engine only partly enclosed, the radiator above the upper wing and a tail like that of the Albatros D.III.

Facts
Year
1917 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Prototype 1
Power (kW)
120 1
Units Built
1 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Fokker V.2 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Fokker V.2 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Fokker V.2 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
The Fokker V.2 and V.3 prototype sesquiplane fighters were developed from the Fokker V.1, but utilized liquid-cooled straight-six engines.
Sources
1. Fokker V.2 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    Only one example of each was constructed in 1917
  • Lead, status
    prototype sesquiplane fighters
  • Lead, engine class
    Mercedes D.III piston engine
  • Lead, power
    160-horsepower (120 kW) Mercedes D.III piston engine
  • Lead, manufacturer
    The Fokker V.2 and V.3 prototype sesquiplane fighters were developed from the Fokker V.1, but utilized liquid-cooled straight-six engines.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.