The Fokker V.1 was a small German sesquiplane experimental fighter prototype built in 1916 by Fokker-Flugzeugwerke. With its parasol wing it was the first Fokker aircraft purportedly designed by Reinhold Platz, although historians dispute the respective roles of Fokker himself, Platz and possibly others in the conceptual design of Fokker airplanes. It was an early experiment in cantilever wing construction, doing away with the bracing wires typical of the time, something Hugo Junkers had already achieved in metal with his pioneering Junkers J 1 in 1915. Its principal innovation was the unbraced cantilever wings, built around two wooden box-girders of thin pine strips with birch plywood webs and covered entirely in plywood, an innovation probably suggested to Fokker by the Swedish engineer Villehad Forssman. The thick airfoil and tapered planform of the upper wing gave it a remarkably modern appearance, and the depth of spar needed made the wing root about a fifth of the chord thick.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source Fokker V.1 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Fokker V.1 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Fokker V.1 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The Fokker V.1 was a small German sesquiplane experimental fighter prototype built in 1916 by the Fokker-Flugzeugwerke.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Fokker V.1 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
The Fokker V.1 was a small German sesquiplane experimental fighter prototype
Sources
1. Fokker V.1 (Wikipedia)
Lead
experimental fighter prototype built in 1916 by the Fokker-Flugzeugwerke
Lead, status
experimental fighter prototype
Lead, manufacturer
The Fokker V.1 was a small German sesquiplane experimental fighter prototype built in 1916 by the Fokker-Flugzeugwerke.
Lead, country of origin
The Fokker V.1 was a small German sesquiplane experimental fighter prototype
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.