The Fieseler Fi 5, previously called the F5, was a single-engined two-seat sportplane of the 1930s built by Fieseler Flugzeugbau, the firm founded by the First World War ace and aerobatic champion Gerhard Fieseler. It was a low-wing tandem two-seat monoplane that kept the fabric-covered steel-tube fuselage of the earlier F 4 but introduced a new two-spar cantilever wing, with a fixed tail-skid undercarriage, open tandem cockpits with dual controls and a large luggage locker behind the rear seat. Powered by a Hirth HM 60 engine, it was one of the company earliest big sellers and competed with the Klemm Kl 25, with pilots liking its shorter wings and different handling. One aircraft was converted to a single-seat aerobatic machine in 1935 for Lise Fastenrath. Only one survived the Second World War, and it was written off in France in 1968.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Fieseler Fi 5 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Fieseler Fi 5 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Fieseler Fi 5 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
It was produced by the German aircraft manufacturer Fieseler Flugzeugbau
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Fieseler Fi 5 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
It was produced by the German aircraft manufacturer Fieseler Flugzeugbau
Sources
1. Fieseler Fi 5 (Wikipedia)
Lead
single-engined two-seat sportplane of the 1930s
Specifications
inverted 4-cyl. air-cooled in-line piston engine
Specifications, power
60 kW (80 hp)
Specifications, speed
Maximum speed: 200 km/h
Specifications, mass
Empty weight: 395 kg
Lead, manufacturer
It was produced by the German aircraft manufacturer Fieseler Flugzeugbau
View the Source2. Fieseler (Wikipedia)
Aircraft listQuote, Aircraft list
acrobatic sportsplane + trainer, 1933
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.