The Farman HF.10 was a French reconnaissance aircraft built shortly before the First World War, developed in 1911 for the military aircraft competition held at Reims. It had a crew of three and was a large pusher aircraft with a length of 10.2 metres, a wingspan of 16.0 metres, a wing area of 72 square metres and a maximum take-off weight of 550 kilograms. The HF.10 had a Gnome rotary engine, listed in the specification as a Gnome Omega seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary of 37 kilowatts driving a two-bladed wooden pusher propeller, and the later HF.10bis had a slightly more powerful Gnome Gamma engine of 70 horsepower. Its maximum speed was 80 kilometres per hour and its range 315 kilometres.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) EngineGnome Omega 7-cylinder rotary 1 Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Farman HF.10 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Farman HF.10 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Farman HF.10 (Wikipedia)Lead, typeQuote, Lead, type
The Farman HF.10 was a reconnaissance aircraft built in France shortly before the First World War.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Farman HF.10 (Wikipedia)Lead, typeQuote, Lead, type
The Farman HF.10 was a reconnaissance aircraft built in France shortly before the First World War.
Sources
1. Farman HF.10 (Wikipedia)
Development, competition
The HF.10 was developed in 1911 for the military aircraft competition (Concours Militaire), held in Reims.
Lead, type
The Farman HF.10 was a reconnaissance aircraft built in France shortly before the First World War.
Specifications, powerplant
Powerplant: 1 × Gnome Omega 7-cylinder air-cooled rotary piston engine, 37 kW (50 hp)
Specifications, power
Powerplant: 1 × Gnome Omega 7-cylinder air-cooled rotary piston engine, 37 kW (50 hp)
Specifications, maximum speed
Maximum speed: 80 km/h (50 mph, 43 kn)
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.