The Farman F.1020 was an experimental aircraft built in France in 1933 to investigate the behaviour of a semi-circular wing fitted with unconventional controls. It had a short career and only one was constructed. The wing, whose study had begun in 1926, was essentially semicircular with the straight edge leading, so that the chord was broad and the aspect ratio very low at 2.1, with a root chord of 5 metres against a span of 7.2 metres. Two deep-chord control surfaces per side on the trailing edge served as ailerons and flaps, and the pilot could switch between conventional and trailing-edge control. The wing was mounted on the fuselage of a Farman F.402 with its 110 horsepower Lorraine five-cylinder radial. First flown in December 1933, nicknamed the Pelle-bêche, it proved almost impossible to spin but had no other particular merits.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Farman F.1020 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Farman F.1020 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Farman F.1020 (Wikipedia)Design, purposeQuote, Design, purpose
The Farman F.1020 was built to test a novel wing design
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Farman F.1020 (Wikipedia)Lead, typeQuote, Lead, type
The Farman F.1020 was an experimental aircraft built in France in 1933
Sources
1. Farman F.1020 (Wikipedia)
Lead, build year
The Farman F.1020 was an experimental aircraft built in France in 1933
Lead, type
The Farman F.1020 was an experimental aircraft built in France in 1933
Specifications, powerplant
Powerplant: 1 × Lorraine 5 Pb 5-cylinder radial, 82 kW (110 hp)
Specifications, power
Powerplant: 1 × Lorraine 5 Pb 5-cylinder radial, 82 kW (110 hp)
Specifications, maximum speed
Maximum speed: 200 km/h (120 mph, 110 kn)
Lead, production
only one was constructed
Design, purpose
The Farman F.1020 was built to test a novel wing design
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.