The Dongfeng EQ2050 is a Chinese reproduction of the American Humvee, built for government use by the Dongfeng Motor Group and reportedly sold at 700,000 yuan a vehicle. Chinese officers decided to build one after watching the Humvee in the Gulf War, and the Chinese petroleum industry had bought civilian Hummers in the 1990s that let automakers inspect one. A prototype appeared in 2002, the EQ2050 debuted at a car show in 2003, and after trials across the Tibetan Plateau, the Gobi desert and Heilongjiang from 2004 to 2006 the People's Liberation Army chose it over a Shenyang Aircraft Corporation rival. The first 100 were built with American parts and a Dongfeng-built Cummins turbo-diesel, and since 2008 almost every part is Chinese. Variants include the armoured EQ2058, the civilian Warrior M50 and several weapon carriers, and it has been exported to armies from Belarus to Zimbabwe and Vietnam.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source Dongfeng EQ2050 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Dongfeng EQ2050 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Dongfeng EQ2050 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
manufactured for government use by the Dongfeng Motor Group
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Dongfeng EQ2050 (Wikipedia)Lead, ChineseQuote, Lead, Chinese
is a Chinese reproduction of the Humvee
Sources
1. Dongfeng EQ2050 (Wikipedia)
History
In 2003, the EQ2050 debuted at a car show after a prototype was made in 2002.
Development
It was powered by a Dongfeng-built Cummins EQB150-20 110 kW/2,700R turbo-charged diesel engine
Lead
While it is used in the PLA, it has also been exported to friendly countries for military use.
Lead, manufacturer
manufactured for government use by the Dongfeng Motor Group
Lead, Chinese
is a Chinese reproduction of the Humvee
Exemplifies: Road Transport, Lead, road vehicle
a Chinese reproduction of the Humvee
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.