The Curtiss Model 41 Lark was a commercial biplane from Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company that pioneering airmail, airline and bush pilots flew in the 1920s. It was based on the Carrier Pigeon airmail plane and shared its longer-span lower wing, since all four wing panels were interchangeable. It was welded tube with fabric covering, carried a pilot and three passengers, and came with a Curtiss C-6, a Wright J-4 Whirlwind or a Wright-Hisso E engine; some were converted to floatplanes. A 200 hp Wright J-4 version tested for the Navy outperformed the Curtiss-engined model and became the basis of the Fledgling series. Operators included Patricia Airways, Florida Airways and Colonial Air Transport.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Curtiss Model 41 Lark (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Curtiss Model 41 Lark (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Curtiss Model 41 Lark (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
was a commercial biplane manufactured by Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Wikipedia: Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor CompanyCompany article, leadQuote, Company article, lead
was an American aircraft manufacturer originally founded by Glenn Hammond Curtiss
Sources
1. Curtiss Model 41 Lark (Wikipedia)
Lead
was a commercial biplane manufactured by Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company
Specifications, powerplant
Curtiss C-6 6-cyl water-cooled in-line piston engine
Specifications
Maximum speed: 99 kn (114 mph, 183 km/h)
Specifications, power
Powerplant: 1 × Curtiss C-6 6-cyl water-cooled in-line piston engine, 160 hp (120 kW)
Specifications, mass
Empty weight: 1,579 lb (716 kg)
View the SourceWikipedia: Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company
Company article, leadQuote, Company article, lead
was an American aircraft manufacturer originally founded by Glenn Hammond Curtiss
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.