The Baldwin RP-210 was a streamlined 1,000 horsepower locomotive built in 1956 by Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton to run with the experimental all-aluminum Train-X coaches of Pullman-Standard. It was Baldwin's attempted entry into the lightweight passenger locomotive market, but only three of the low-slung diesel-hydraulic units were produced: one for the New York Central's Ohio Xplorer and a pair for the New Haven's Dan'l Webster. The New Haven units, with three independent power systems, were among the most complex locomotives in America. The RP-210 was the last locomotive design to bear the BLH name, and it and its trains failed to meet their goals, so its service life was short.
Facts
Connections
Of Make
Source Baldwin RP-210 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Baldwin RP-210 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The RP-210 was a streamlined 1,000 hp (750 kW) locomotive built in 1956 by Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Wikipedia: Baldwin Locomotive WorksLeadQuote, Lead
The Baldwin Locomotive Works (BLW) was an American manufacturer of railway locomotives from 1825 to 1951.
Sources
1. Baldwin RP-210 (Wikipedia)
Lead, production years
locomotive built in 1956 by Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton
Lead, locomotive type
only three of the low-slung diesel-hydraulic units were produced
Lead, power rating
a streamlined 1,000 hp (750 kW) locomotive
Lead, units built
only three of the low-slung diesel-hydraulic units were produced
Lead
The RP-210 was a streamlined 1,000 hp (750 kW) locomotive built in 1956 by Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton
In Group: American Passenger Diesel Locomotives, Lead, locomotive role
attempted entry into the lightweight passenger locomotive market
View the SourceWikipedia: Baldwin Locomotive Works
LeadQuote, Lead
The Baldwin Locomotive Works (BLW) was an American manufacturer of railway locomotives from 1825 to 1951.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.