The AgustaWestland AW119 Koala is an eight-seat utility helicopter powered by a single turboshaft engine and built for the civil market, aimed at operators who prefer the lower running costs of one engine to the redundancy of a twin. It was introduced as the Agusta A119 Koala before the Agusta and Westland merger and has been produced by Leonardo since 2016. The A119 designation was first given in the 1970s to a proposed 11-seat stretch of the AW109 that was never built; the helicopter that actually entered production was conceived in 1994, while Agusta was recovering from a period of financial trouble. The second of two prototypes made its first flight in February 1995 and the first prototype was used for static tests. In early 2015 AgustaWestland and Bristow Helicopters jointly offered an upgraded variant as a replacement for the US Navy's fleet of 117 Bell TH-57 trainer helicopters under a fee-for-service arrangement.
Facts
Engine Class Maximum Mass (kg) Connections
Exemplifies
Source AgustaWestland AW119 Koala (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source AgustaWestland AW119 Koala (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source AgustaWestland AW119 Koala (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The AgustaWestland AW119 Koala, produced by Leonardo since 2016
Sources
1. AgustaWestland AW119 Koala (Wikipedia)
Development, first flight
In February 1995, the second of two prototypes conducted its first flight.
Specifications: Powerplant
Powerplant: 1 × Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6B-37A turboshaft engine, 747 kW (1,002 hp) 917shp
Specifications: Empty weight
Empty weight: 1,483 kg (3,269 lb)
Specifications: Maximum mass
Max takeoff weight: 2,850 kg (6,283 lb)
Lead
produced by Leonardo since 2016
Lead, body style
is an eight-seat utility helicopter powered by a single turboshaft engine produced for the civil market
Lead, manufacturer
The AgustaWestland AW119 Koala, produced by Leonardo since 2016
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.