The AEG G.II was a biplane bomber built by AEG for the Imperial German Air Service as an improved G.I with more powerful engines, two 110 kilowatt Benz inline piston engines. It typically carried two machine guns and 200 kilograms of bombs, with armour plate for the nose gunner. Stability on one engine proved poor, so many were fitted with extra rudders. Batches of six and twelve were ordered in 1915, and front-line strength peaked at 13 in December 1915. The battleplane idea failed because the aircraft was too slow, but it was used successfully as a bomber in squadron strength.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source AEG G.II (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source AEG G.II (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source AEG G.II (Wikipedia)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
built by the Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft (AEG) during the First World War
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source AEG G.II (Wikipedia)Lead, German aircraftQuote, Lead, German aircraft
for the Imperial German Army's (Deutsches Heer) Imperial German Air Service (Luftstreitkräfte)
Sources
1. AEG G.II (Wikipedia)
Development, front-line use
The highest number of G.IIs on the front-line strength report was 13 in December 1915
Specifications, powerplant
Powerplant: 2 × Benz Bz.III water-cooled straight-six piston engine
Lead
was a biplane bomber
Specifications, performance
Maximum speed: 140 km/h (87 mph, 76 kn)
Specifications, empty weight
Empty weight: 1,450 kg (3,197 lb)
Lead, maker
built by the Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft (AEG) during the First World War
Lead, German aircraft
for the Imperial German Army's (Deutsches Heer) Imperial German Air Service (Luftstreitkräfte)
In Group: First World War Bombers and Two-Seaters, Lead, role
biplane bomber
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, aircraft
biplane bomber
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.