The AEG G.I, factory designation GZ1, was a prototype twin-engined German biplane built by AEG for the Imperial German Air Service. It was conceived as a battleplane or aerial cruiser to engage enemy aircraft with flexible machine guns and attack ground targets. No single engine of 150 kilowatts was available in Germany, so AEG used two 75 kilowatt Mercedes D.I inline piston engines. The first prototype, the K.I, flew in January 1915 and performed well enough to justify a second, more heavily armed prototype, the G.I, which went to a combat unit in April 1915.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source AEG G.I (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source AEG G.I (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source AEG G.I (Wikipedia)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
built by the Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft (AEG) during the First World War
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source AEG G.I (Wikipedia)Lead, German aircraftQuote, Lead, German aircraft
for the Imperial German Army's (Deutsches Heer) Imperial German Air Service (Luftstreitkräfte)
Sources
1. AEG G.I (Wikipedia)
Development, first flight
The aircraft made its first flight in January 1915.
Specifications, powerplant
Powerplant: 2 × Mercedes D.I water-cooled straight-six piston engines
Lead
was a prototype twin-engined German biplane
Specifications, performance
Maximum speed: 125 km/h (78 mph, 67 kn)
Specifications, empty weight
Empty weight: 1,160 kg (2,557 lb)
Lead, maker
built by the Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft (AEG) during the First World War
Lead, German aircraft
for the Imperial German Army's (Deutsches Heer) Imperial German Air Service (Luftstreitkräfte)
In Group: First World War Bombers and Two-Seaters, Lead, role
prototype twin-engined German biplane
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, aircraft
prototype twin-engined German biplane
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.