Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Peterbilt 365/367

Trucks and Commercial Road Vehicles

The Models 365 and 367 are heavy-duty Class 8 Peterbilt trucks introduced in 2006 as the successors to the 357 and 378. They are built in vocational and severe-service configurations, and the model line is also offered as a tractor. The newer Model 567 of 2013 shares its size and functionality with the 367 while adopting the cab design of the 579. The article lists the 365 and 367 as a current model, with a run of 2006 to the present.

Facts
Year
2006 1
Status
In Production 1
Comparison
Body Style
Truck 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Source Wikipedia: Peterbilt

Of Make

Source Wikipedia: Peterbilt
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Wikipedia: PeterbiltHistory, 2000s
Quote, History, 2000s
Serving as the successor to the 357 and 378, the 365 and 367 were introduced, serving as heavy-duty Class 8 trucks; along with vocationally oriented configurations, the model line is also offered as a tractor.

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Wikipedia: PeterbiltLead
Quote, Lead
Peterbilt Motors Company is an American truck manufacturer specializing in the production of heavy-duty (Class 8) and medium-duty (Classes 5–7) commercial vehicles.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Peterbilt
  • History, 2000s
    Serving as the successor to the 357 and 378, the 365 and 367 were introduced, serving as heavy-duty Class 8 trucks; along with vocationally oriented configurations, the model line is also offered as a tractor.
  • Models, Current, Heavy trucks
    Model 365/367 severe-service/vocational (2006, present)
  • Lead
    Peterbilt Motors Company is an American truck manufacturer specializing in the production of heavy-duty (Class 8) and medium-duty (Classes 5-7) commercial vehicles.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.