The Scammell Contractor was a heavy 6x4 tractor unit that Scammell designed and put into production in 1964, when the company was part of the Leyland group. It was fitted with a Cummins 335 engine, a Lipe clutch and a Fuller semi-automatic gearbox, and could be ordered with Leyland 24 tonne or Scammell 30 and 40 tonne bogies. It was popular in the United Kingdom for operations above 240 tons gross train weight and was also used by militaries for tank transport. The Australian Army ran Contractors with 335 horsepower Cummins diesel engines and pneumocyclic gearboxes, as tank transporters in Vietnam War era trials and for heavy haulage of engineering plant for the Royal Australian Engineers. One trials vehicle carried the Scammell name, while most later units were branded Leyland. A Contractor Mk2 was developed in the late 1970s.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source Scammell (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Scammell (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Scammell (Wikipedia)
Contractor, production start
The factory also designed the 6x4 Contractor equipped with a Cummins 335 engine, Lipe clutch and Fuller semi-automatic gearbox, that went into production in 1964.
Contractor, driveline
The factory also designed the 6x4 Contractor equipped with a Cummins 335 engine, Lipe clutch and Fuller semi-automatic gearbox, that went into production in 1964.
Contractor, Australian units
The Australian military units were configured with 335HP Cummins diesel engines and pneumocyclic gearboxes.
Introduction
Scammell Lorries Limited was a British manufacturer of lorries, particularly specialist and military off-road vehicles, between 1921 and 1988.
In Group: European Heavy Trucks, Contractor
The Contractor was a 6x4 tractor used by various operators including the Australian Army as a tank transporter or as heavy haulage
Exemplifies: Road Freight Transport, Contractor
The Contractor was a 6x4 tractor used by various operators including the Australian Army as a tank transporter or as heavy haulage
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.