The British Rail Mark 2 is the second design of British Rail railway carriages, of steel construction and built between 1964 and 1975 by British Rail workshops, from 1969 British Rail Engineering Limited. Its semi-integral construction gave more strength than the Mark 1 and tackled the corrosion at the base of the body where it met the underframe. The prototype, FK 13252, was built in 1963 and is preserved at the Mid-Norfolk Railway, and all production coaches were built on a single assembly line at the British Rail carriage works at Derby. The Mark 2 was a mainstay of the InterCity network, and electric multiple units such as Classes 310 and 312 used its bodyshell. Most have since been withdrawn, though some remain in use on charters, heritage railways and Network Rail test trains.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source British Rail Mark 2 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source British Rail Mark 2 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source British Rail Mark 2 (Wikipedia)Lead, builderQuote, Lead, builder
They were built by British Rail workshops (from 1969 British Rail Engineering Limited (BREL)) between 1964 and 1975
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source British Rail Mark 2 (Wikipedia)Lead, builderQuote, Lead, builder
They were built by British Rail workshops (from 1969 British Rail Engineering Limited (BREL)) between 1964 and 1975
Sources
1. British Rail Mark 2 (Wikipedia)
Lead, build years
They were built by British Rail workshops (from 1969 British Rail Engineering Limited (BREL)) between 1964 and 1975
Service, United Kingdom
new rolling stock introduced in the post-privatisation era has resulted in most being withdrawn
Current
As of May 2020, Mark 2 coaches are still in use on some services on the UK rail network.
Lead, builder
They were built by British Rail workshops (from 1969 British Rail Engineering Limited (BREL)) between 1964 and 1975
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.