The Sopwith Buffalo was an armoured two-seat fighter and reconnaissance biplane of 1918. In July 1918 the British Air Ministry asked Sopwith, which was already building the armoured Salamander, for an armoured aircraft to fly the dangerous contact patrol mission, keeping in touch with attacking troops at low level over enemy trenches where small-arms fire caused heavy casualties. Sopwith answered with the 3F.2 Buffalo, a single-engined tractor biplane with two-bay wooden wings and a 230 hp Bentley BR.2 rotary engine, carrying a forward-firing Vickers gun and a Lewis gun for the observer. Two were built, and no production followed because the end of the war removed the need for such an aircraft.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Maximum Mass (kg) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Sopwith Buffalo (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Sopwith Buffalo (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Sopwith Buffalo (Wikipedia)Lead, units builtQuote, Lead, units built
two examples of the Buffalo were built by Sopwith
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Sopwith Buffalo (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
was a British armoured fighter/reconnaissance aircraft
Sources
1. Sopwith Buffalo (Wikipedia)
Development and design
In July 1918, the British Air Ministry requested Sopwith
Lead
The Sopwith Buffalo was a British armoured fighter/reconnaissance aircraft of the First World War
Specifications
Bentley BR.2 9-cylinder rotary engine
Specifications, power
230 hp (170 kW)
Specifications, empty weight
Empty weight: 2,178 lb (988 kg)
Specifications, gross weight
Gross weight: 3,071 lb (1,393 kg)
Specifications, speed
Maximum speed: 114 mph (183 km/h, 99 kn) at 1,000 ft (300 m)
Lead, units built
two examples of the Buffalo were built by Sopwith
Lead, country of origin
was a British armoured fighter/reconnaissance aircraft
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.