The Supermarine Type 324 was a British two-engined fighter design, put forward in 1938 together with the Type 325 as a replacement for the Spitfire and the Hawker Hurricane. Air Ministry specification F.18/37 asked for a fighter with a speed of more than 400 miles per hour at 15,000 feet and twelve .303 inch machine guns, and Supermarine submitted brochures describing the Type 324, under company specification 458, and the Type 325, one with a tractor and one with a pusher layout, using either Rolls-Royce Merlin or Bristol Taurus engines. The Type 324 was a low-wing twin-engined monoplane with the Spitfire's elliptical wing shape and a retractable tricycle undercarriage, with an expected maximum speed of 450 miles per hour. Neither it nor the revised cannon-armed Type 327 was accepted for development, and Hawker's designs, the Tornado and Typhoon, were ordered instead.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 StatusDesign only (never built) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Supermarine Type 324 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Supermarine Type 324 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Supermarine Type 324 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Supermarine Type 324 and Type 325 were British two-engined fighter designs proposed as the replacement for the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Supermarine Type 324 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Supermarine Type 324 and Type 325 were British two-engined fighter designs proposed as the replacement for the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane
Sources
1. Supermarine Type 324 (Wikipedia)
Lead
The Supermarine Type 324 and Type 325 were British two-engined fighter designs proposed as the replacement for the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane
Lead, status
Neither of them nor a revised design - the Type 327 - to carry cannon was accepted for development and production
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.