The Kawasaki Ki-88 was a proposed single-seat fighter for the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force that never got beyond a full-scale mock-up. In 1942, with the Ki-64 delayed, the army was open to other fighter designs that might reach units sooner, and Kawasaki began work on the Ki-88 in August of that year. It was inspired by the American Bell P-39 Airacobra, with a 1,500 horsepower Kawasaki Ha-140 engine mounted behind the cockpit and driving the propeller through an extension shaft, a 37 mm cannon firing through the propeller hub and two 20 mm cannons in the lower nose. The calculated top speed of 600 km/h was barely better than the Ki-61 already in production, so Kawasaki stopped work in less than a year.
Facts
Engine Class StatusDesign only (never built) 1 EngineKawasaki Ha-140 18-cylinder liquid-cooled piston engine 1 Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Kawasaki Ki-88 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Kawasaki Ki-88 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Kawasaki Ki-88 (Wikipedia)Design and developmentQuote, Design and development
Kawasaki proposed the Ki-88
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Kawasaki Ki-88 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
was a proposed Japanese World War II fighter aircraft intended for use by the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force
Sources
1. Kawasaki Ki-88 (Wikipedia)
Lead
was a proposed Japanese World War II fighter aircraft
Specifications
Kawasaki Ha-140 18-cyl. liquid-cooled piston engine, 1,120 kW (1,500 hp)
Specifications, engine
Kawasaki Ha-140 18-cyl. liquid-cooled piston engine
Specifications, power
1,120 kW (1,500 hp)
Lead, status
only a mock-up was completed
Design and development
Kawasaki proposed the Ki-88
Lead, country of origin
was a proposed Japanese World War II fighter aircraft intended for use by the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.