The Grumman XP-65 was a twin-engine fighter developed alongside the F7F Tigercat and cancelled in early 1942, before any prototype was completed. After the XP-50 was lost on 14 May 1941, the Army Air Corps moved its funding to the XP-65 project, which Grumman had originally designated G-51. It was to be an advanced version of the XP-50, using the more powerful Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp, an air-cooled 18-cylinder radial engine. The design had thick mid-fuselage wings with a straight leading edge, engines housed in nacelles partly under the wings, a narrow but tall oval fuselage, a cockpit just ahead of the wing leading edge and a tricycle undercarriage. Grumman hoped one basic design could serve both the Army Air Forces and the Navy on a single production line, but the Army version would have used turbochargers while the naval version would drop them and add arrester hooks and folding wings. The naval version of the G-51 went on to become the XF7F-1.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Grumman XP-65 (Wikipedia, Italian)
Of Make
Source Grumman XP-65 (Wikipedia, Italian)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Grumman XP-65 (Wikipedia, Italian)LeadQuote, Lead
Il Grumman XP-65 fu un aereo da caccia bimotore sviluppato parallelamente al F7F Tigercat
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Grumman XP-65 (Wikipedia, Italian)Sviluppo, fundingQuote, Sviluppo, funding
Army Air Corps trasferì i finanziamenti al progetto XP-65
Sources
1. Grumman XP-65 (Wikipedia, Italian)
Lead
Il Grumman XP-65 fu un aereo da caccia bimotore sviluppato parallelamente al F7F Tigercat
Lead, cancellation
ma fu cancellato all'inizio del 1942 prima di raggiungere lo stadio prototipo
Sviluppo, engine
utilizzando il più potente motore radiale a 18 cilindri raffreddato ad aria Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp
Sviluppo, funding
Army Air Corps trasferì i finanziamenti al progetto XP-65
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.