The Fairey Flycatcher was a British single-seat biplane fighter built by the Fairey Aviation Company for operation from aircraft carriers, and it served with the Fleet Air Arm from 1923 to 1934. It was designed to Specification N6/22 as a carrier and floatplane fighter to replace the Gloster Nightjar, and it beat the Parnall Plover that was built to the same requirement. The first of three prototypes flew on 28 November 1922 with an Armstrong Siddeley Jaguar engine. It was one of the earliest aircraft designed specifically for carrier work, with flaps along the full trailing edge of both wings that let it operate from only about 50 yards of deck, hydraulic wheel brakes and arrestor hooks, and a fuselage of wood and metal with fabric covering. The wheels could be swapped for floats for catapult launching from capital ships. Around 192 were produced and it flew from every British carrier of its day. No original aircraft survives, but a 1977 replica is held by the Fleet Air Arm Museum.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Maximum Mass (kg) EngineArmstrong Siddeley Jaguar IV 1 Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Fairey Flycatcher (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Fairey Flycatcher (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Fairey Flycatcher (Wikipedia)
Design and development
The first of three prototype Flycatchers made its maiden flight on 28 November 1922
Lead
The Fairey Flycatcher was a British single-seat biplane carrier-borne fighter aircraft made by Fairey Aviation Company which served from 1923 to 1934.
Specifications (Flycatcher I)
1 × Armstrong Siddeley Jaguar IV 14-cylinder two-row air-cooled radial piston engine, 400 hp (300 kW)
Specifications (Flycatcher I), mass
Empty weight: 2,038 lb (924 kg)
Specifications (Flycatcher I), maximum mass
Gross weight: 3,028 lb (1,373 kg) land-plane
Specifications (Flycatcher I), top speed
Maximum speed: 133 mph (214 km/h, 116 kn) at sea level
Production
Some 192 were produced.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.