Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Curtiss XP-10

Military Aircraft

The Curtiss XP-10 was an experimental biplane fighter that Curtiss developed for the United States Army Air Corps and that was rejected after it missed performance targets and suffered cooling problems. Ordered on 18 June 1928, it was meant to win dogfights and used a gull-wing upper wing joined at the fuselage for better pilot visibility and lower drag, plywood-covered wings and a fabric-covered steel tube fuselage. A 600 hp Curtiss V-1570-15 Conqueror water-cooled V12 drove it, cooled by a corrugated brass radiator built into the upper wing, which was vulnerable to gunfire. Delivered in August 1928 and first flown that September, it was slightly faster than the P-6 Hawk but climbed worse.

Facts
Year
1928 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Abandoned 1
Power (kW)
447 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Curtiss XP-10 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Curtiss XP-10 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Curtiss XP-10 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
was an American experimental biplane fighter developed by Curtiss

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Curtiss XP-10 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
was an American experimental biplane fighter developed by Curtiss
Sources
1. Curtiss XP-10 (Wikipedia)
  • Operational history
    Delivered to the Army Air Corps in August 1928, the XP-10 first flew in September.
  • Lead
    was an American experimental biplane fighter developed by Curtiss
  • Design and development, engine
    600 hp (447 kW) Curtiss V-1570-15 Conqueror water-cooled V12 engine
  • Operational history, status
    led to the project being abandoned
  • Design and development, power
    600 hp (447 kW) Curtiss V-1570-15 Conqueror water-cooled V12 engine
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.