Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Curtiss Falcon

Military Aircraft

The Curtiss Falcon was a family of military biplanes that Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company built in the 1920s. Most served the United States Army Air Corps as the O-1 and O-11 observation aircraft or as the A-3 Falcon attack aircraft, while Navy variants began as F8C Falcon fighter-bombers and the Marine Corps flew the F8C-4 Helldiver as its first dive bomber. The XO-1 prototype won the 1925 Army trials after being re-engined, and production O-1s used the 435 hp Curtiss V-1150 engine; the wings were wood and the fuselage aluminium tube. The type was introduced in 1925, flew first-line in the United States to 1934, and fought for Sao Paulo in Brazil in 1932.

Facts
Year
1925 1
Status
Retired from service 1
Power (kW)
324 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Curtiss Falcon (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Curtiss Falcon (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Curtiss Falcon (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
built by the American aircraft manufacturer Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company during the 1920s

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Curtiss Falcon (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
built by the American aircraft manufacturer Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company during the 1920s
Sources
1. Curtiss Falcon (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The type was introduced in 1925
  • Lead, body style
    was a family of military biplane aircraft
  • Operational history
    second-line service with reserve units until 1937
  • Design and development, power
    the 435 hp (324 kW) Curtiss V-1150 (D-12) engine
  • Lead, manufacturer
    built by the American aircraft manufacturer Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company during the 1920s
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.