Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Vickers V-1000

Military Aircraft

The Vickers V-1000 was a proposed British jet-powered strategic cargo aircraft designed by Vickers-Armstrongs to meet a Ministry of Supply requirement for a transport that would support the Royal Air Force V-bomber fleet. It was a scaled-up relative of the Vickers Valiant, with four Rolls-Royce Conway turbofans buried in the wings, and the same basic design was to be offered to BOAC as the six-abreast VC7 transatlantic airliner. The prototype, serial XD662, was about 80 per cent complete when the Ministry cancelled the project in 1955. Its cancellation became a famous British what-if, was debated in the House of Commons, and the design pushed Boeing and Douglas to enlarge the fuselages of the 707 and DC-8.

Facts
Engine Class
Jet 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Engine
Rolls-Royce Conway turbofan engines (intended) 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Vickers V-1000 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Vickers V-1000 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Vickers V-1000 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Vickers-Armstrongs V-1000 was a proposed jet-powered cargo aircraft

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Vickers V-1000 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of origin
Quote, Lead, country of origin
a requirement issued by the British Ministry of Supply
Sources
1. Vickers V-1000 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Vickers-Armstrongs V-1000 was a proposed jet-powered cargo aircraft
  • Development, intended engine
    its intended use of the Rolls-Royce Conway, which was the first production bypass engine
  • Lead, engine class
    a proposed jet-powered cargo aircraft
  • Lead, status
    the Ministry of Supply decided to terminate the V-1000 project in mid-development
  • Lead, country of origin
    a requirement issued by the British Ministry of Supply
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.