Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Ilyushin Il-106

Military Aircraft

The Ilyushin Il-106 was a proposed Russian heavy military transport aircraft of the 1990s, intended to replace the Il-76. It would have been a four-engined, high-wing cantilever monoplane with a large cabin 34 m long, powered by four Kuznetsov NK-92 or D-100 turbofans of roughly 177 to 186 kN thrust each. The published figures give a length of 57.6 m, a wingspan of 58.5 m, an empty weight of 135,000 kg, a gross weight of 258,000 kg and a useful lift of 80,000 kg, with a cruise speed of 850 km/h and a range of 5,000 km. The design never entered production. In 2016 it was announced that the Il-106 airframe would be re-used for the PAK VTA project, a proposed large military transport for the Russian Air Force.

Facts
Engine Class
Turbofan 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Ilyushin Il-106 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Ilyushin Il-106 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Ilyushin Il-106 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Ilyushin Il-106

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Ilyushin Il-106 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of origin
Quote, Lead, country of origin
a proposed 1990s Russian heavy military transport to replace the Il-76
Sources
1. GlobalSecurity.org: Il-106 (GlobalSecurity.org)
GlobalSecurity.org
  • Design, powerplant
    The plane was to use the new NK-92 high-bypass turbofan
  • Design, airframe
    The IL-106 is a cantilever all-metal monoplane
  • Programme history
    The Il-106 program was initially expected to enter the flight-testing stage in 1997 but was postponed indefinitely
View the Source
Ilyushin Il-106 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Ilyushin Il-106
  • Lead, country of origin
    a proposed 1990s Russian heavy military transport to replace the Il-76
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.