The Boeing Model 493 was a proposed large, turboprop-driven transport aircraft that Boeing envisaged in the early 1950s for the US Air Force. The Model 493-3-2 was similar to the baseline C-97 Stratofreighter but had a gull wing, an increased wingspan of 165 feet from tip to tip and turboprop engines, and its fuselage diameter was increased to 214 inches to fit a second deck like that of the Douglas C-124 Globemaster II. Although it was a promising design, it never left the drawing board because the Air Force announced the XC-Heavy competition, based on a pod-equipped airlifter. Some sources call the Model 493-3-2 the C-127, but Air Force records show that designator was allocated to the Douglas C-124B.
Facts
Engine Class StatusDesign only (never built) 1 Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
An aircraft, so it exemplifies the aviation mode.
Source Boeing Model 493 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Boeing built this type.
Source Boeing Model 493 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Boeing Model 493 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The Boeing Model 493 was a proposed, large, turboprop-driven transport aircraft
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Boeing Model 493 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
by the United States aircraft manufacturer Boeing for use by the USAF
Sources
1. Boeing Model 493 (Wikipedia)
Design and development, outcome
the Model 493 never left the drawboard
Design and development, powerplant
but also turboprop engines
Lead
a proposed, large, turboprop-driven transport aircraft
Lead, manufacturer
The Boeing Model 493 was a proposed, large, turboprop-driven transport aircraft
Lead, country of origin
by the United States aircraft manufacturer Boeing for use by the USAF
In Group: Military Transport Aircraft, Lead, role
a proposed, large, turboprop-driven transport aircraft
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.