The TAI Hürjet is a single-engine, tandem-seat, supersonic advanced jet trainer and light combat aircraft being developed by Turkish Aerospace Industries. Its name joins the Turkish words for free and jet and also honours the aviator and engineer Vecihi Hürkuş. The project began in July 2017 as a company-funded venture, and the first prototype flew on 25 April 2023 from the company's test airfield in Ankara. The Turkish Air Force intends it to replace the Northrop T-38M Talon in the trainer role and to supplement the F-16 in close air support, and the company is also seeking export orders. The prototype specification lists one General Electric F404-GE-104 afterburning turbofan, and a second prototype followed the first in flight testing.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source TAI Hürjet (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source TAI Hürjet (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source TAI Hürjet (Wikipedia)Lead, builderQuote, Lead, builder
under development by Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI)
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source TAI Hürjet (Wikipedia)Lead, builderQuote, Lead, builder
under development by Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI)
Sources
1. TAI Hürjet (Wikipedia)
Lead, first flight
The first prototype made its first flight on 25 April 2023
Lead, builder
under development by Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI)
Lead, body style
single-engine, tandem seat, supersonic advanced jet trainer and light combat aircraft
Specifications, powerplant
Powerplant: 1 × General Electric F404-GE-104 afterburning turbofan engine
In Group: Military Trainer Aircraft, Lead, type of aircraft
single-engine, tandem seat, supersonic advanced jet trainer and light combat aircraft
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, type of aircraft
single-engine, tandem seat, supersonic advanced jet trainer and light combat aircraft
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.