The HAL HLFT-42, short for Hindustan Lead-in Fighter Trainer 42, is a design for a supersonic lead-in fighter trainer proposed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited. HAL showed a scale model at Aero India 2023, with the idea that it would train pilots for the Tejas Mk2 and the planned AMCA fighter and replace the Indian Air Force BAE Hawk 132 trainers, while also being armed well enough to fly combat missions. The concept dates from 2017, the design was reworked in 2025 after Air Force comments, HAL has not chosen an engine, and its future was questioned in 2026 when HAL offered a Tejas trainer variant against the same lead-in trainer requirement.
Facts
StatusDesign only (never built) 1 Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source HAL HLFT-42 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source HAL HLFT-42 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source HAL HLFT-42 (Wikipedia)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
proposed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source HAL HLFT-42 (Wikipedia)Lead, countryQuote, Lead, country
is a design for an Indian lead-in fighter trainer proposed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)
Sources
1. HAL HLFT-42 (Wikipedia)
Lead, unveiling
HAL unveiled the design of the scale model of the HLFT-42 at the 14th edition of Aero India (2023)
Lead, design stage
is a design for an Indian lead-in fighter trainer proposed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)
Lead, maker
proposed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)
Lead, country
is a design for an Indian lead-in fighter trainer proposed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)
In Group: Military Trainer Aircraft, Lead, role
is a design for an Indian lead-in fighter trainer proposed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, role
is a design for an Indian lead-in fighter trainer proposed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.