The Fokker C.IV was a Dutch two-seat reconnaissance biplane of the 1920s, designed and built by Fokker as a larger and more robust development of the earlier C.I. It had a fixed tailwheel undercarriage with a wider track and a wider fuselage than the C.I, and was originally powered by the 336 kW Napier Lion piston engine. Examples went to the Dutch Army Air Corps (30 aircraft) and the Dutch East Indies Army (10), and it was exported to the Soviet Union (55) and the United States Army Air Service (eight), while Spain built twenty under licence. After reconnaissance service the aircraft served as trainers into the 1930s, and a preserved C.IVa is at the Owls Head Transportation Museum in Maine.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Maximum Mass (kg) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Fokker C.IV (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Fokker C.IV (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Fokker C.IV (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Fokker C.IV is a 1920s Dutch two-seat reconnaissance aircraft that was designed and built by
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Fokker C.IV (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
The Fokker C.IV is a 1920s Dutch two-seat reconnaissance aircraft
Sources
1. Fokker C.IV (Wikipedia)
Lead
The Fokker C.IV is a 1920s Dutch two-seat reconnaissance aircraft that was designed and built by
Specifications (C.IV)
Empty weight: 1,450 kg (3,197 lb)
Specifications (C.IV), maximum mass
Gross weight: 2,270 kg (5,004 lb)
Specifications (C.IV), top speed
Maximum speed: 214 km/h (133 mph, 116 kn)
Specifications (C.IV), power
Powerplant: 1 × Napier Lion W-12 water-cooled piston engine , 336 kW (450 hp)
Design and development
was originally powered by the Napier Lion piston engine
Lead, country of origin
The Fokker C.IV is a 1920s Dutch two-seat reconnaissance aircraft
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.