The Northrop F-89 Scorpion was an all-weather, twin-engined interceptor aircraft designed and produced by Northrop Corporation. Internally designated the N-24, it was first designed with a slim fuselage, two Allison J35 turbojets buried in the lower fuselage behind their intakes, and a swept wing. The XF-89, with 4,000 lbf J35-A-9 engines, proved underpowered, and a fatal accident on 22 February 1950 prompted alterations including afterburning Allison J33-A-21 engines, AN/APG-33 radar and the Hughes E-1 fire-control system. Production was disrupted by problems with early models, led to major structural modifications, and resumed in full during 1953. About 170 F-89Ds, most built before production resumed, were retrofitted to the later standard.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Engine Class Connections
Exemplifies
Source Northrop F-89 Scorpion (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Northrop F-89 Scorpion (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Northrop F-89 Scorpion (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
designed and produced by the American aircraft manufacturer Northrop Corporation
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Northrop F-89 Scorpion (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
designed and produced by the American aircraft manufacturer Northrop Corporation
Sources
1. Northrop F-89 Scorpion (Wikipedia)
Design and development
the two Allison J35 turbojet engines were buried in the lower fuselage
Lead
The Northrop F-89 Scorpion is an all-weather, twin-engined interceptor aircraft designed and produced by the American aircraft manufacturer Northrop Corporation.
Lead, manufacturer
designed and produced by the American aircraft manufacturer Northrop Corporation
View the SourceAllison J35 (Wikipedia)
Has Part: Allison J35, ApplicationsQuote, Has Part: Allison J35, Applications
Northrop F-89 Scorpion
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.