The Fieseler Fi 167 was a 1930s German biplane torpedo and reconnaissance bomber designed for the Graf Zeppelin class aircraft carriers. The Reich Aviation Ministry issued the carrier-based torpedo bomber specification in early 1937 to Fieseler and Arado, and by mid-1938 the Fieseler design proved superior to the Arado Ar 195. It exceeded the requirements and, like the Fi 156 Storch, could fly very slowly and land almost vertically on a moving carrier. It had a Daimler-Benz DB 601B engine of 820 kW and a two-man crew. Two prototypes and twelve pre-production aircraft were built. With the carrier unfinished, the aircraft served in German test units, were sold to Croatia in 1943, and supplied besieged Croatian garrisons in 1944. No examples are known to have survived.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Fieseler Fi 167 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Fieseler Fi 167 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Fieseler Fi 167 (Wikipedia)MakeQuote, Make
By mid-1938 the Fieseler design proved to be superior to the Arado design
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Fieseler Fi 167 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
1930s German biplane torpedo and reconnaissance bomber
Sources
1. Fieseler Fi 167 (Wikipedia)
Lead
German biplane torpedo and reconnaissance bomber
Specifications
Daimler-Benz DB 601B V-12 inverted liquid-cooled piston engine
Specifications, power
820 kW (1,100 hp)
Specifications, speed
Maximum speed: 325 km/h
Specifications, mass
Empty weight: 2,806 kg
Make
By mid-1938 the Fieseler design proved to be superior to the Arado design
Lead, country of origin
1930s German biplane torpedo and reconnaissance bomber
View the Source2. Fieseler (Wikipedia)
YearQuote, Year
Fi 167, ship-borne torpedo bomber and reconnaissance biplane, 1938
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.