The Northrop YA-13 was a single attack aircraft built as a company funded demonstrator on the Northrop Gamma 2C, a development of the earlier Gamma 2A and 2B designs that had been created mainly for racing and speed record work. For the Gamma 2C the cockpit was moved forward to a conventional position, and the United States Army Air Corps evaluated it in mid-1933, then bought it after modifications and designated it YA-13. Testing at Wright Field showed it was underpowered, so its single row radial engine was replaced with a more powerful twin row radial and a three blade propeller, and the aircraft was redesignated XA-16. The change swung it from underpowered to overpowered. Northrop was already working on a parallel attack design that became the A-17, the main single engine attack aircraft of the Army Air Corps in the late 1930s, and with that success the YA-13 and XA-16 programme never went beyond testing.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Northrop YA-13 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Northrop YA-13 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Northrop YA-13 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Northrop YA-13 was an attack version of the Northrop Gamma type aircraft.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Northrop YA-13 (Wikipedia)OperatorsQuote, Operators
United States Army Air Corps
Sources
1. Northrop YA-13 (Wikipedia)
Design and development, Air Corps evaluation
The Air Corps evaluated the Northrop Gamma 2C attack aircraft in mid-1933.
Design and development, outcome
With the success of the A-17, the YA-13/XA-16 program never progressed past the test phase.
Design and development, engines
The replacement engine, a twin-row radial, was more powerful and had a smaller diameter.
Lead
The Northrop YA-13 was an attack version of the Northrop Gamma type aircraft.
Operators
United States Army Air Corps
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.