Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Convair XB-53

Military Aircraft

The Convair XB-53 was a proposed jet-powered medium bomber that Convair designed for the United States Army Air Forces, notable for a tailless layout with forward-swept wings. It began in 1945 as the XA-44 attack aircraft, and when the requirement became a light bomber in 1946 it was redesignated XB-53 with a 30 degree forward-swept wing borrowed from German wartime research and a glazed nose. Three Allison J35 turbojets were to power it, and it would have carried 12,000 pounds of bombs. It was developed alongside the XB-46, and the Air Force considered cancelling that aircraft in its favour. The programme was cancelled before either of two prototypes was completed.

Facts
Engine Class
Jet 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Top Speed (km/h)
930 1
Mass (kg)
14,406 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Convair XB-53 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Convair XB-53 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Convair XB-53 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
designed by Convair for the United States Army Air Forces

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Convair XB-53 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
designed by Convair for the United States Army Air Forces
Sources
1. Convair XB-53 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Convair XB-53 was a proposed jet-powered medium bomber aircraft
  • Lead, status
    the project was canceled before either of the two prototypes were completed
  • Design and development
    powered by three J35-GE turbojets
  • Specifications (XB-53 estimated)
    Maximum speed: 500 kn (580 mph, 930 km/h)
  • Specifications (XB-53 estimated), mass
    Empty weight: 31,760 lb (14,406 kg)
  • Lead, manufacturer
    designed by Convair for the United States Army Air Forces
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.