The Tupolev Samolyot 135 was a designation used for two different strategic bomber projects in the Soviet Union in the late 1950s and early 1960s, neither of which progressed beyond the drawing board. The first, proposed in 1958, was a Tu-95 derivative carrying a long-range cruise missile, with an estimated range of about 4,000 km. Two years later the second was envisioned as a supersonic interdiction bomber available with a variety of engines, including a nuclear-powered version. It settled on a canard delta layout similar to the North American XB-70A Valkyrie, with paired Kuznetsov NK-6 turbofan nacelles under each wing and a single large fin, and armed mainly with missiles for maritime and logistics interdiction. Work was suspended when the Sukhoi T-4 became the favoured design and the cost proved high, though the experience helped later Tupolev bombers and the Tu-144, which carried the code name Tu-135P.
Facts
Engine Class StatusDesign only (never built) 1 Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Tupolev Samolyot 135 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Tupolev Samolyot 135 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Tupolev Samolyot 135 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The Tupolev Samolyot 135 was a designation
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Tupolev Samolyot 135 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
strategic bomber projects in the Soviet Union
Sources
1. Tupolev Samolyot 135 (Wikipedia)
Lead
was a designation that was used for two different strategic bomber projects in the Soviet Union
Lead, status
neither of which progressed beyond the drawing board
Design and development
paired Kuznetsov NK-6 turbofan engine nacelles under each wing
Lead, manufacturer
The Tupolev Samolyot 135 was a designation
Lead, country of origin
strategic bomber projects in the Soviet Union
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.