Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Myasishchev M-18

Military Aircraft

The Myasishchev M-18 was a Soviet design for a supersonic bomber with a variable-sweep wing. It was drawn up in response to a 1972 Soviet programme for a new multi-mission, supersonic, variable-geometry strategic bomber with a top speed of Mach 2.3, the Soviet answer to the American Rockwell B-1 Lancer. Of the competing designs it was judged the most successful compared with the Tupolev Tu-160 and the Sukhoi T-4, yet the project was dropped in favour of the Tu-160 programme because Tupolev had the most potential to carry the bomber project forward. In 1973 Tupolev was assigned to develop a new aircraft based on the Myasishchev design. The M-18 was never built.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Myasishchev M-18 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Myasishchev M-18 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Myasishchev M-18 (Wikipedia)Lead, bureau
Quote, Lead, bureau
The Myasishchev M-18 was a design for a Soviet supersonic bomber

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Myasishchev M-18 (Wikipedia)Lead, country
Quote, Lead, country
was a design for a Soviet supersonic bomber with a variable-sweep wing
Sources
1. Myasishchev M-18 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, country
    was a design for a Soviet supersonic bomber with a variable-sweep wing
  • Lead, status
    The project was dropped in favour of the Tupolev Tu-160 program.
  • Lead, bureau
    The Myasishchev M-18 was a design for a Soviet supersonic bomber
  • In Group: Bombers, Lead, role
    was a design for a Soviet supersonic bomber with a variable-sweep wing
  • Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, mode
    was a design for a Soviet supersonic bomber with a variable-sweep wing
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.