Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Mitsubishi Ki-21

Military Aircraft

The Mitsubishi Ki-21, the Army Type 97 Heavy Bomber that the Allies code-named Sally and Gwen, was a twin-engine heavy bomber of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Second World War. It was built to a 1936 requirement to replace the Ki-20 and Ki-1, and beat Nakajima rival Ki-19 in a competition after both makers swapped engines. As an all-metal mid-wing monoplane with retractable landing gear, it flew first on 18 December 1936 and entered service in August 1938. It fought in China, at Nomonhan and across the early Pacific War, and late in the war flew commando raids on Okinawa. Production ended in September 1944 after 2,064 had been built.

Facts
Year
1936 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Out of production 1
Power (kW)
1100 1
Units Built
2064 1
Top Speed (km/h)
485 1
Mass (kg)
6070 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Mitsubishi Ki-21 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Mitsubishi Ki-21 (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Mitsubishi Ki-21 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    was a Japanese heavy bomber during World War II
  • Design and development, first flight
    The first prototype flew on 18 December 1936
  • Design and development, production
    Several improved versions followed before the production of the type ended in September 1944.
  • Design and development, production, units built
    A total of 2,064 aircraft were built, 1,713 by Mitsubishi and 351 by Nakajima.
  • Specifications, maximum speed
    Maximum speed: 485 km/h (301 mph, 262 kn)
  • Specifications, empty weight
    Empty weight: 6,070 kg (13,382 lb)
  • Specifications, powerplant
    1,100 kW (1,500 hp)
  • Specifications, powerplant, engine class
    14-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engine
  • Design and development
    The Mitsubishi design was an all-metal mid-wing cantilever monoplane with retractable landing gear
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.