Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Mitsubishi B4M

Military Aircraft

The Mitsubishi B4M, also called the Ka-12, was a carrier-based biplane torpedo bomber of 1934, of which Mitsubishi built two prototypes for the Imperial Japanese Navy. It developed the company's earlier 3MT10, replacing the heavy Rolls-Royce Buzzard V-12 with a lighter experimental Mitsubishi radial engine and using aluminium wings, which cut the weight by 590 kilograms. Designer Hajime Matsuhara gave it inverse gull lower wings and a wide-track undercarriage for an 800 kilogram torpedo. The first prototype flew in August 1934, but the wing proved inefficiently stiff and could not safely reach its theoretical speed, the aircraft was unstable, and the Navy chose the Yokosuka B4Y instead.

Facts
Year
1934 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Power (kW)
480 1
Units Built
2 1
Top Speed (km/h)
241 1
Mass (kg)
2000 1
Engine
Mitsubishi 8-Shi 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Mitsubishi B4M (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Mitsubishi B4M (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Mitsubishi B4M (Wikipedia)
  • Operational history
    first flew in August 1934
  • Operational history, status
    The Navy rejected the design
  • Lead
    Two prototypes
  • Specifications (B4M1)
    Empty weight: 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)
  • Specifications (B4M1), top speed
    Maximum speed: 241 km/h (150 mph, 130 kn)
  • Specifications (B4M1), power
    480 kW (650 hp)
  • Specifications (B4M1), engine class
    air-cooled radial piston engine
  • Specifications (B4M1), engine
    Mitsubishi 8-Shi 14-cylinder
  • Lead, body style
    Japanese carrier-based torpedo bomber of 1934
  • Lead, manufacturer
    Mitsubishi submitted a design based on their unsuccessful 7-shi entry
  • Lead, country of origin
    The Mitsubishi Ka-12 or B4M was a Japanese carrier-based torpedo bomber of 1934
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.