Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Martin XB-16

Military Aircraft

The Martin XB-16, company designation Model 145, was a projected heavy bomber that the Glenn L. Martin Company designed in the 1930s for the United States Army Air Corps, which wanted an aircraft able to carry 2,500 pounds of bombs over 5,000 miles. Martin proposed four liquid-cooled Allison V-1710 engines, unusual at a time when American aircraft used air-cooled radials, and in 1935 reworked the layout as the larger Model 145B, whose wingspan was 20 percent greater than that of the later B-29 Superfortress. The Army judged it not fast enough, as it had the Boeing XB-15, and the project was cancelled before any airframe was built, so it survives only as a design study.

Facts
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Martin XB-16 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Martin XB-16 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Martin XB-16 (Wikipedia)Design and development, manufacturer
Quote, Design and development, manufacturer
In 1935, Martin revised the XB-16 design as the Model 145B.

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Martin XB-16 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
was a projected heavy bomber designed in the United States during the 1930s
Sources
1. Martin XB-16 (Wikipedia)
  • Design and development
    The XB-16 was canceled for essentially the same reason that the Boeing XB-15 project was
  • Specifications (Model 145A)
    4 × Allison V-1710-3 V-12 liquid-cooled piston engines
  • Lead
    was a projected heavy bomber designed in the United States during the 1930s
  • Design and development, manufacturer
    In 1935, Martin revised the XB-16 design as the Model 145B.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.