The Martin P4M Mercator was a maritime reconnaissance aircraft built by the Glenn L. Martin Company for a United States Navy requirement for a long-range maritime patrol bomber, with work on the Model 219 beginning in 1944 as a replacement for the PB4Y Privateer and optimisation for long-range minelaying. Its most unusual feature was a mix of piston and jet power: two Pratt and Whitney R4360 Wasp Major 28-cylinder radial engines, with two Allison J33 turbojets in the rear of the enlarged nacelles for takeoff and combat boost, burning gasoline rather than jet fuel. It first flew on 20 October 1946, lost the production contest to the Lockheed P2V Neptune, and had a limited life as an electronic reconnaissance aircraft until final withdrawal in 1960, after which the remaining aircraft were scrapped.
Facts
Engine Class Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Martin P4M Mercator (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Martin P4M Mercator (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Martin P4M Mercator (Wikipedia)Lead, body styleQuote, Lead, body style
was a maritime reconnaissance aircraft built by the Glenn L. Martin Company
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Martin P4M Mercator (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
an unsuccessful contender for a United States Navy requirement for a long-range maritime patrol bomber
Sources
1. Martin P4M Mercator (Wikipedia)
Design and development
with the first flight being on 20 October 1946
Operational history
Final withdrawal from service was in 1960 after which all of the remaining P4Ms were scrapped.
Lead
powered by a combination of piston engines and turbojets
Lead, body style
was a maritime reconnaissance aircraft built by the Glenn L. Martin Company
Lead, country of origin
an unsuccessful contender for a United States Navy requirement for a long-range maritime patrol bomber
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.