The Latécoère 5 was a French three-engined biplane night bomber prototype of the early 1920s, developed by Latécoère from its Latécoère 4 passenger aircraft for the BN4 programme, which called for a bomb load of 1,500 kg. The design was registered in January 1921, but a dispute between the State and the company over engines delayed the first flight to 18 February 1924: the State wanted more powerful Renault engines that were not available, while Latécoère preferred Lorraine engines for their better power-to-weight ratio. It had fabric-covered wooden wings and a metal-framed fuselage, three water-cooled Lorraine 12D V-12 engines of about 275 kW each, and the pilot and co-pilot sat side by side ahead of the wing. Its span was 2 m greater than that of the Latécoère 4 and its fuselage 3.3 m longer. It went to Villacoublay for official testing in the late summer of 1924, only one was built, and its later fate is not known.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Latécoère 5 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Latécoère 5 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Latécoère 5 (Wikipedia)Design and development, productionQuote, Design and development, production
No more Latécoère 5s were built
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Latécoère 5 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Latécoère 5 was a French three-engined biplane bomber prototype of the early 1920s, based on the Latécoère 4 passenger aircraft.
Sources
1. Latécoère 5 (Wikipedia)
Lead
The Latécoère 5 was a French three-engined biplane bomber prototype of the early 1920s, based on the Latécoère 4 passenger aircraft.
Design and development, first flight
the first flight did not take place until 18 February 1924
Lead, status
The Latécoère 5 was a French three-engined biplane bomber prototype of the early 1920s
Design and development, production
No more Latécoère 5s were built
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.