Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Focke-Wulf Fw 42

Military Aircraft

The Focke-Wulf Fw 42 was a design for a twin-engined medium bomber of canard configuration, drawn up by Heinrich Focke at Focke-Wulf in Germany in the early 1930s in response to a 1929 Reichswehr specification. It was based on his earlier F 19 Ente light transport and had a long slender fuselage with gun positions at each end, an aft-mounted wing, fully retractable tricycle landing gear, an internal bomb bay and a planned crew of six. Two 750 horsepower BMW VI engines were expected to give a top speed near 300 km/h. A full-scale mockup with working gun turrets was built and several air forces showed interest, but no development contract was issued and the project was abandoned. No example was ever built.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Focke-Wulf Fw 42 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Focke-Wulf Fw 42 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Focke-Wulf Fw 42 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
designed by Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau AG in Germany in the early 1930s

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Focke-Wulf Fw 42 (Wikipedia)Lead, origin
Quote, Lead, origin
designed by Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau AG in Germany in the early 1930s
Sources
1. Focke-Wulf Fw 42 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, type
    was a design for a twin-engined medium bomber
  • Production end
    no examples of the type were ever built
  • Lead, manufacturer
    designed by Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau AG in Germany in the early 1930s
  • Lead, origin
    designed by Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau AG in Germany in the early 1930s
  • In Group: Bombers, Lead, role
    twin-engined medium bomber
  • Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, role
    twin-engined medium bomber
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.