Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Douglas 1211-J

Military Aircraft

The Douglas 1211-J was a heavy bomber design that Douglas developed to compete with the Boeing B-52 for a major United States Air Force contract between 1946 and 1954. The Model 1211-J was 160 feet long with a wingspan of 227 feet and was powered by four turboprop engines. It was designed around a new 43,000 pound conventional bomb but could also carry nuclear weapons, and it could carry its own fighter escorts as parasites under its wings, whose jet engines would assist the takeoff and which would be refuelled while stowed on the underwing pylons. The listed crew was nine, and its published estimates came from Aviation Week in January 1951.

Facts
Engine Class
Turboprop 1
Top Speed (km/h)
837 1
Maximum Mass (kg)
146,057 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Douglas 1211-J (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Douglas 1211-J (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Douglas 1211-J (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, maker
    The Douglas 1211-J was a bomber aircraft design developed by American aircraft manufacturer Douglas
  • Lead, engine class
    was powered by four turboprop engines
  • Specifications, gross weight
    Gross weight: 322,000 lb (146,057 kg)
  • Specifications, maximum speed
    Maximum speed: 450 kn (520 mph, 830 km/h)
  • Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, aircraft
    The Douglas 1211-J was a bomber aircraft design developed by American aircraft manufacturer Douglas
  • In Group: Bombers, Lead, role
    The Douglas 1211-J was a bomber aircraft design developed by American aircraft manufacturer Douglas
View the Source
Wikipedia: Douglas Aircraft Company
WikipediaLead, nationality of the maker
Quote, Lead, nationality of the maker
The Douglas Aircraft Company was an American aerospace and defense company that was based in Southern California.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.