Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

De Havilland DH.65 Hound

Military Aircraft

The de Havilland DH.65 Hound was a British two-seat day bomber and general purpose biplane of the 1920s, built at Stag Lane Aerodrome as a private venture to meet Air Ministry Specification 12/26. The all-wooden prototype G-EBNJ, powered by a Napier Lion engine, first flew on 17 November 1926, and in 1927 it was reworked with a new nose and rudder and a geared engine as the DH.65A. The Royal Air Force evaluated it in 1928 as J9127, and although it outperformed the other entrants it was rejected because of its wooden construction, with the order going to the Hawker Hart. In April 1928 it still set a world record, carrying a load of 1,000 kg over 100 km at 257 km/h with H.S. Broad at the controls. A four-seat transport development, the DH.74, was never built, and the second airframe was left unfinished.

Facts
Year
1926 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Abandoned 1
Top Speed (km/h)
246 1
Mass (kg)
1352 1
Maximum Mass (kg)
2238 1
Engine
Napier Lion XI 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source De Havilland DH.65 Hound (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source De Havilland DH.65 Hound (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. De Havilland DH.65 Hound (Wikipedia)
  • History, first flight
    first flew on 17 November 1926
  • Lead
    The de Havilland DH.65 Hound was a 1920s British two-seat day bomber built by de Havilland at Stag Lane Aerodrome
  • Specifications, powerplant
    Powerplant: 1 × Napier Lion XI W-12 water-cooled piston engine, 550 hp (410 kW)
  • Specifications, engine class
    Powerplant: 1 × Napier Lion XI W-12 water-cooled piston engine, 550 hp (410 kW)
  • Specifications, empty weight
    Empty weight: 2,981 lb (1,352 kg)
  • Specifications, gross weight
    Gross weight: 4,934 lb (2,238 kg)
  • Specifications, maximum speed
    Maximum speed: 153 mph (246 km/h, 133 kn)
  • Status
    The design being otherwise unsuccessful
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.