Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Fairey S.9/30

Military Aircraft

The Fairey S.9/30 was a two-seat, single-engine biplane built to Air Ministry specification S.9/30 for a fleet spotter reconnaissance aircraft, and the progenitor of the Fairey Swordfish. Its stainless steel structure was fabric covered, and its folding wings carried slots on the upper wing. Unlike the Swordfish it had a steam-cooled V-12 Rolls-Royce Kestrel rather than a radial. The only example, known by its specification number, first flew on 22 February 1934 as a landplane and in 1935 as a seaplane, and was tested at Felixstowe in 1936. The related TSR I, which flew in 1933 with a radial engine, led on to the production Swordfish.

Facts
Year
1934 1
Top Speed (km/h)
219 1
Mass (kg)
2063 1
Maximum Mass (kg)
2948 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Fairey S.9/30 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Fairey S.9/30 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Fairey S.9/30 (Wikipedia)Development, manufacturer
Quote, Development, manufacturer
The design evolution that led to the Fairey Swordfish began with Fairey's submission to Air Ministry specification S.9/30 for a two-seat fleet spotter-reconnaissance aircraft.
Sources
1. Fairey S.9/30 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Fairey S.9/30 was a two-seat, single-engined biplane built to meet an Air Ministry specification for a fleet reconnaissance aircraft.
  • Development
    which did not fly until 22 February 1934
  • Specifications
    Empty weight: 4,548 lb (2,063 kg)
  • Specifications, maximum mass
    Gross weight: 6,500 lb (2,948 kg)
  • Specifications, top speed
    Maximum speed: 136 mph (219 km/h, 118 kn)
  • Development, manufacturer
    The design evolution that led to the Fairey Swordfish began with Fairey's submission to Air Ministry specification S.9/30 for a two-seat fleet spotter-reconnaissance aircraft.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.