The Boeing HH-47 CSAR-X was a proposed combat search and rescue helicopter, a derivative of the CH-47 Chinook that Boeing offered as a medium to heavy lift alternative to the HH-60 Pave Hawk. The Air Force wanted a helicopter that could fly out 316 miles, loiter for five minutes during an extraction and return, compared with 213 miles for the Pave Hawk. The design added forward-looking infrared pods, terrain avoidance radar, a rescue hoist, in-flight refuelling, an anti-corrosion layer, heavier armour, wire strike cutters and an environmentally controlled treatment area for four litters. Boeing was pronounced the winner and four development aircraft and 141 production aircraft were planned, but Lockheed Martin protested and requested a Government Accountability Office review in 2007, and the Air Force did not choose the HH-47; the HH-60W entered service in 2020 instead.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
The type belongs to this mode of transport.
Source HH-47 CSAR-X prototype (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Boeing built this type.
Source HH-47 CSAR-X prototype (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source HH-47 CSAR-X prototype (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The HH-47 CSAR-X was a proposed helicopter by Boeing as a medium/heavy lift alternative to the HH-60 Pave Hawk.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source HH-47 CSAR-X prototype (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
In February 2010, the USAF announced plans to replace aging HH-60G helicopters
Sources
1. HH-47 CSAR-X prototype (Wikipedia)
Lead
was a proposed helicopter by Boeing
Lead, status
the Air Force did not choose the larger HH-47
Lead, manufacturer
The HH-47 CSAR-X was a proposed helicopter by Boeing as a medium/heavy lift alternative to the HH-60 Pave Hawk.
Lead, country of origin
In February 2010, the USAF announced plans to replace aging HH-60G helicopters
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.