The Rocketdyne XRS-2200 was an experimental linear aerospike rocket engine that Rocketdyne developed in the mid-1990s for the Lockheed Martin X-33 technology demonstrator. Instead of a bell nozzle it used a linear aerospike nozzle, and its powerpack, the turbomachinery and gas generator, was derived from the J-2 engine that powered the upper stage of the Saturn V, so it kept the J-2 combustion cycle and propellant choice. It was the subscale step toward the RS-2200, the version Rocketdyne intended to develop for the VentureStar. The X-33 program was cancelled, but two XRS-2200 engines were produced and tested before development ended.
Facts
Classification
Fuel or Cycle Displacement or Thrust1,192 kN (267,972 lbf) thrust 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Rocketdyne XRS-2200 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Rocketdyne XRS-2200 (Wikipedia)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
The Rocketdyne XRS-2200 was an experimental linear aerospike engine developed in the mid-1990s for the Lockheed Martin X-33 program.
Sources
1. Encyclopedia Astronautica: XRS-2200
Encyclopedia AstronauticaEntry text
Rocketdyne LOx/LH2 rocket engine.
Key facts, thrust
Thrust 1,192.00 kN (267,972 lbf)
View the Source Rocketdyne XRS-2200 (Wikipedia)
Lead, maker
The Rocketdyne XRS-2200 was an experimental linear aerospike engine developed in the mid-1990s for the Lockheed Martin X-33 program.
Part Of: Lockheed Martin X-33, Lead, vehicle fitted
The Rocketdyne XRS-2200 was an experimental linear aerospike engine developed in the mid-1990s for the Lockheed Martin X-33 program.
In Group: Rocket Engines, Lead, group
The Rocketdyne XRS-2200 was an experimental linear aerospike engine developed in the mid-1990s for the Lockheed Martin X-33 program.
Exemplifies: Space Transport, Lead, mode
The Rocketdyne XRS-2200 was an experimental linear aerospike engine developed in the mid-1990s for the Lockheed Martin X-33 program.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.