The Mercedes-Benz OM606 is a 3.0 litre (2,996 cc) inline-six diesel engine with double overhead camshafts and indirect injection, built by Mercedes-Benz between 1993 and 2001 to replace the single overhead camshaft OM603. Like the OM603 it has a cast iron block, here with seven main caps, and an aluminum head with four valves per cylinder and hydraulic bucket lifters. A Bosch electronically controlled inline pump is used except in the W124, which keeps a mechanically governed Bosch M pump. A notable difference from its turbocharged predecessors is the intercooler, and only the .962 version in the W210 E300 Turbodiesel carried an air mass sensor. It is related to the OM604 four-cylinder and OM605 five-cylinder of the same period.
Facts
Classification
Fuel or Cycle Configuration Cylinder Count Connections
Exemplifies
Source Mercedes-Benz OM606 engine (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Mercedes-Benz OM606 engine (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Mercedes-Benz OM606 engine (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
inline-six cylinder (R6/I6) double overhead camshaft (DOHC) diesel engine with indirect injection manufactured by Mercedes-Benz between 1993 and 2001
Sources
1. Mercedes-Benz OM606 engine (Wikipedia)
Lead
inline-six cylinder (R6/I6) double overhead camshaft (DOHC) diesel engine with indirect injection manufactured by Mercedes-Benz between 1993 and 2001
Lead, cylinder count
inline-six cylinder (R6/I6) double overhead camshaft (DOHC) diesel engine with indirect injection manufactured by Mercedes-Benz between 1993 and 2001
Lead, fuel
inline-six cylinder (R6/I6) double overhead camshaft (DOHC) diesel engine with indirect injection manufactured by Mercedes-Benz between 1993 and 2001
Part Of: Mercedes-Benz W124, Lead, W124
except in the W124 where it uses a Bosch mechanically governed inline injection pump
Part Of: Mercedes-Benz E-Class W210, Design, W210
installed on the W210 E300 TURBODIESEL
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.