Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Engine

Mercedes-Benz M123 engine

Automotive Engines

The Mercedes-Benz M123 is a family of 2.5 litre (2,525 cc) straight-six overhead camshaft petrol engines developed for the new W123 range and used from 1976 to 1984 in the 250 and 250 T models. Naturally aspirated and fed by a four-barrel Solex carburettor, it replaced the M180 in the 230 and the 2.8 litre M130 in the 250 derived from the W114 series. Like the M180 it has only four crankshaft bearings, but its cylinders are evenly spaced, as in the M130, and it has a chain-driven single overhead camshaft working vertical valves through rocker levers. Quiet but thirsty, it was the only engine newly developed for the 123 series, was uprated in 1979, and was succeeded by the M103 in 1984.

Facts
Classification
Fuel or Cycle
Gasoline / Petrol 1
Configuration
Inline 1
Year
1976 1
Cylinder Count
6 1
Connections

Of Make

Source Mercedes-Benz M123 engine (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Mercedes-Benz M123 engine (Wikipedia)Lead, maker
Quote, Lead, maker
The M123 is a family of 2.5 L (2,525 cc) straight-6 overhead cam Mercedes-Benz automobile engines
Sources
1. Mercedes-Benz M123 engine (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, production
    used from 1976 to 1984 on the 250 and 250 T models
  • Lead, layout
    The M123 is a family of 2.5 L (2,525 cc) straight-6 overhead cam Mercedes-Benz automobile engines
  • Characteristics, fuel system
    The engine is equipped with gasoline feed and return lines
  • Lead, maker
    The M123 is a family of 2.5 L (2,525 cc) straight-6 overhead cam Mercedes-Benz automobile engines
  • In Group: Road Car Engines of Europe and Japan, Lead, engine group
    The M123 is a family of 2.5 L (2,525 cc) straight-6 overhead cam Mercedes-Benz automobile engines
  • Part Of: Mercedes-Benz W123, Lead, application
    developed for its new W123 range
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.